mirror of
https://github.com/Zenithsiz/ftmemsim-valgrind.git
synced 2026-02-03 10:05:29 +00:00
f9ee4517a0
Explicitly use ordinary scalar delete and update the expecteds. Otherwise g++ uses sized scalar delete whilse clang uses ordinary scalar delete which causes a diff.
52 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
52 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
#include <new>
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
|
class alignas(64) MyClass {
|
|
public:
|
|
int i;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class OrdinaryClass {
|
|
public:
|
|
int i;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int main() {
|
|
// unsized versions
|
|
MyClass* myClass = new MyClass;
|
|
operator delete(myClass, std::align_val_t(64U));
|
|
|
|
MyClass* myClass5 = new MyClass[5];
|
|
operator delete [](myClass5, std::align_val_t(64U));
|
|
|
|
// sized versions
|
|
myClass = new MyClass();
|
|
operator delete(myClass, 64U, std::align_val_t(64U));
|
|
|
|
myClass5 = new MyClass[5];
|
|
operator delete [](myClass5, 320U, std::align_val_t(64U));
|
|
|
|
MyClass* myClassNt = new (std::nothrow) MyClass;
|
|
operator delete(myClassNt, std::align_val_t(64U), std::nothrow);
|
|
|
|
MyClass* myClass5Nt = new (std::nothrow) MyClass[5];
|
|
operator delete [](myClass5Nt, std::align_val_t(64U), std::nothrow);
|
|
|
|
OrdinaryClass* oClass = new OrdinaryClass;
|
|
// this is a limitation, VG does not use enough bits
|
|
// to tell apart aligned and unaligned allocations
|
|
// so new/aligned delete is not a mismatch
|
|
operator delete(oClass, std::align_val_t(64U));
|
|
oClass = new (std::nothrow) OrdinaryClass;
|
|
//delete oClass;
|
|
// changed the above delete because GCC generates
|
|
// a sized delete (???) whilst clang generates an ordinary delete
|
|
operator delete(oClass);
|
|
oClass = new OrdinaryClass[5];
|
|
delete [] oClass;
|
|
oClass = new (std::nothrow) OrdinaryClass[5];
|
|
delete [] oClass;
|
|
}
|
|
|