Philippe Waroquiers d7ccda99e6 modifty sleepers to have easier evaluation of interaction between cpu freq scaling
and scheduler lock (pipe based or futex based)

See http://www.valgrind.org/docs/manual/manual-core.html#manual-core.pthreads_perf_sched
for background info about cpu freq scaling and valgrind thread scheduler.

To reproduce the interaction, do:
for sched in --fair-sched=yes --fair-sched=no
do
  for affinity in 0 1
  do
    echo $sched $affinity
    time ./vg-in-place $sched -q ./gdbserver_tests/sleepers 1000000 0 1000 B-B-B-B- $affinity
  done
done

which gives the below output (intel core i5-6402P, debian 8, kernel  3.16.0).
In summary: the fair scheduler is fair, the pipe based scheduler
can be really unfair (e.g. with --fair-sched=no and no affinity,
2 threads are finishing their work, while the 2 other threads are
starting their work only after the first 2 have fully finished).
The difference in timing is significant : 1m14s versus around 47 seconds.

  Note: If the governor is set to performance, strangely, the time needed for
  --fair-sched=no increases slighltly (to around 48 seconds).
  The time for --fair-sched=yes with or without affinity is then also
  to around 48 seconds.

Below is timing with on-demand governor:

--fair-sched=yes 0
loops/sleep_ms/burn/threads_spec/affinity:  1000000 0 1000 B-B-B-B- 0
Brussels ready to sleep and/or burn
London ready to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok ready to sleep and/or burn
main ready to sleep and/or burn
Brussels finished to sleep and/or burn
London finished to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok finished to sleep and/or burn
main finished to sleep and/or burn

real	1m14.582s
user	1m14.348s
sys	0m0.204s
--fair-sched=yes 1
loops/sleep_ms/burn/threads_spec/affinity:  1000000 0 1000 B-B-B-B- 1
Brussels ready to sleep and/or burn
London ready to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok ready to sleep and/or burn
main ready to sleep and/or burn
main finished to sleep and/or burn
Brussels finished to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok finished to sleep and/or burn
London finished to sleep and/or burn

real	0m46.785s
user	0m46.756s
sys	0m0.032s
--fair-sched=no 0
loops/sleep_ms/burn/threads_spec/affinity:  1000000 0 1000 B-B-B-B- 0
Brussels ready to sleep and/or burn
Brussels finished to sleep and/or burn
London ready to sleep and/or burn
London finished to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok ready to sleep and/or burn
main ready to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok finished to sleep and/or burn
main finished to sleep and/or burn

real	0m47.742s
user	0m48.224s
sys	0m0.084s
--fair-sched=no 1
loops/sleep_ms/burn/threads_spec/affinity:  1000000 0 1000 B-B-B-B- 1
Brussels ready to sleep and/or burn
London ready to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok ready to sleep and/or burn
main ready to sleep and/or burn
Brussels finished to sleep and/or burn
London finished to sleep and/or burn
main finished to sleep and/or burn
Petaouchnok finished to sleep and/or burn

real	0m46.601s
user	0m46.568s
sys	0m0.036s



git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@16251
2017-02-19 11:23:46 +00:00

16 lines
660 B
Plaintext

# Tests the case when gdb sends a character to gdbserver while
# the gdbserver was forced invoked just before.
# gdbserver must send a signal to itself that is wait-ed for by vgdb.
# But if this signal is masked, then vgdb does not recuperate the control
# and Valgrind dies. See function give_control_back_to_vgdb in m_gdbserver.c
prog: sleepers
args: 1 10000000 0 -S-S-S-S 1
vgopts: --tool=none --vgdb=yes --vgdb-error=0 --vgdb-prefix=./vgdb-prefix-nlsigvgdb
stderr_filter: filter_stderr
prereq: test -e gdb -a -f vgdb.invoker
progB: gdb
argsB: --quiet -l 60 --nx ./sleepers
stdinB: nlsigvgdb.stdinB.gdb
stdoutB_filter: filter_gdb
stderrB_filter: filter_gdb