ftmemsim-valgrind/memcheck/tests/fprw.stderr.exp
Nicholas Nethercote 9f2118c217 Fix this regression test to account for the fact that FP regs are now
checked for definedness errors lazily, just like integer regs.



git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@3084
2004-11-23 17:19:53 +00:00

41 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:16)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:17)
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:18)
Invalid write of size 8
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:20)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:18)
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:19)
Invalid write of size 4
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:21)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:19)
Invalid free() / delete / delete[]
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:22)
Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
Invalid write of size 8
at 0x........: main (fprw.c:24)
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (fprw.c:23)