Test separately whether g++ and/or gcc support built-in functions for atomic

memory access. Apparently for some distributions gcc 4.2 has that support but
g++ 4.2 doesn't. This patch has been supplied by Florian Krohm.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@11665
This commit is contained in:
Bart Van Assche 2011-03-24 20:27:54 +00:00
parent d6740217a1
commit a4d817dbae
2 changed files with 34 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ AC_TRY_LINK(,
[
ac_have_builtin_atomic=yes
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC, 1, [Define to 1 if gcc supports __sync_bool_compare_and_swap() a.o.])
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC, 1, [Define to 1 if gcc supports __sync_bool_compare_and_swap() and __sync_add_and_fetch()])
],
[
ac_have_builtin_atomic=no
@ -1859,6 +1859,33 @@ CFLAGS=$safe_CFLAGS
AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC], [test x$ac_have_builtin_atomic = xyes])
# does g++ have built-in functions for atomic memory access ?
AC_MSG_CHECKING([if g++ supports __sync_bool_compare_and_swap])
safe_CXXFLAGS=$CXXFLAGS
CXXFLAGS="$mflag_primary"
AC_LANG_PUSH(C++)
AC_TRY_LINK(,
[
int variable = 1;
return (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&variable, 1, 2)
&& __sync_add_and_fetch(&variable, 1) ? 1 : 0)
],
[
ac_have_builtin_atomic_cxx=yes
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC_CXX, 1, [Define to 1 if g++ supports __sync_bool_compare_and_swap() and __sync_add_and_fetch()])
],
[
ac_have_builtin_atomic_cxx=no
AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
])
AC_LANG_POP(C++)
CXXFLAGS=$safe_CXXFLAGS
AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC_CXX], [test x$ac_have_builtin_atomic_cxx = xyes])
#----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Ok. We're done checking.

View File

@ -323,9 +323,13 @@ if HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC
check_PROGRAMS += \
annotate_barrier \
annotate_rwlock \
annotate_smart_pointer \
atomic_var \
circular_buffer \
circular_buffer
endif
if HAVE_BUILTIN_ATOMIC_CXX
check_PROGRAMS += \
annotate_smart_pointer \
tsan_unittest
endif