mirror of
https://github.com/Zenithsiz/ftmemsim-valgrind.git
synced 2026-02-03 10:05:29 +00:00
Add suppressions for glibc DTV leaks
The glibc DTV (Dynamic Thread Vector) for the main thread is never released, not even through __libc_freeres. This causes it to always show up as a reachable block when used, and sometimes, when it is extended and then reduced, as a possible leak when memcheck cannot find a pointer to the start of the block. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796433 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796559 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417578
This commit is contained in:
parent
5920eb0c43
commit
28371e73db
1
NEWS
1
NEWS
@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ n-i-bz Fix non-glibc build of test suite with s390x_features
|
||||
417427 commit to fix vki_siginfo_t definition created numerous regression
|
||||
errors on ppc64
|
||||
417452 s390_insn_store_emit: dst->tag for HRcVec128
|
||||
417578 Add suppressions for glibc DTV leaks
|
||||
417906 clone with CLONE_VFORK and no CLONE_VM fails
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -248,3 +248,37 @@
|
||||
Memcheck:Cond
|
||||
fun:_dl_runtime_resolve_avx_slow
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# The main thread dynamic thread vector, DTV, which contains pointers
|
||||
# to thread local variables, isn't freed. There are a couple of call
|
||||
# patterns that can cause it to be extended.
|
||||
{
|
||||
dtv-addr-tail
|
||||
Memcheck:Leak
|
||||
match-leak-kinds: possible,reachable
|
||||
fun:malloc
|
||||
fun:tls_get_addr_tail*
|
||||
fun:__tls_get_addr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
dtv-addr-resize
|
||||
Memcheck:Leak
|
||||
match-leak-kinds: possible,reachable
|
||||
fun:malloc
|
||||
fun:_dl_resize_dtv
|
||||
fun:_dl_update_slotinfo
|
||||
fun:update_get_addr
|
||||
fun:__tls_get_addr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
dtv-addr-init
|
||||
Memcheck:Leak
|
||||
match-leak-kinds: possible,reachable
|
||||
fun:malloc
|
||||
fun:allocate_dtv_entry
|
||||
fun:allocate_and_init
|
||||
fun:tls_get_addr_tail*
|
||||
fun:__tls_get_addr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user